|
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 8:59 AM): Good morning Rob, all!
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
8:59 AM): We're very punctual around here....
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 8:59
AM): Good Morning!
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
8:59 AM): OK
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:01 AM): Well, the old clock on the wall says it's just about
time for yet another Free Clinic! Let the festivities begin!
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:02
AM): We just started a new domain to sell ebooks and digital
material at smarter-health.com
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:02 AM): Is Marc still here?
marcrosenbaum (4/22/2002 9:02 AM): Good
Morning Rob
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:03 AM): Entered
the room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:03 AM): Hi Marc...what can I help you with today?
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:03
AM): I put a link from www.emperorsherbologist.com but any ideas
on getting noticed fast?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:03 AM): Ah, the lovely denise742 has arrived....
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:04 AM): Hello,
Hello, Hello
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:04 AM): Weber, why a new domain?
Tamra (tamra@hcstudios.com) (4/22/2002
9:04 AM): Entered the room.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:04 AM): Hello,
Hello, Hello
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:05
AM): We wanted something separate strictly for digital stuff
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 9:05 AM): [hi Tamra]
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:05
AM): Kind of like a mini-site
Tamra (tamra@hcstudios.com) (4/22/2002
9:05 AM): [hi Jonathan]
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:05 AM): What
are we talking about?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:05 AM): Still don't know why you'd do that, Weber. I have lots
of digital stuff for sale, but it's all under the same URLs.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:07 AM): In fact, it would add depth to your site as a resource....
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:07
AM): We want to keep the emperorsherbologist for hard product
that needs to be shipped, otherwise it may get to confusing,
also, we can say things at a strictly digital site that does
not promote hard products (supplements) that we can't at a site
selling supplements
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:07 AM): Denise, did you have a question I can help with?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:08 AM): Weber, why wouldn't you just have an eh's digital download
page?
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:08 AM): Entered
the room.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:08 AM): Well
I'm trying to reach home-based business.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:09 AM): Entered the room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:09 AM): What kind of business do you run, Denise?
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:09 AM): Do you
know how I can reach those businesses without the large expense
of newspaper adver.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:09 AM): I run
a secretarial business.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:09
AM): Mostly for internal reasons, and we are limited with what
we say when selling supplements
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:10 AM): Denise do you offer services throughout the country
over the web or are you local?
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:10 AM): I have
a website. Most of my clients are long distance.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:11 AM): I also
have a 24-hour phone in dictation machine, this is a great asset
for long distance relations.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:11 AM): Hmmmm, Weber. I'm not sure I see the conflict there...supplements
you have to be careful of, but digital downloads are just info.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:11 AM): What kind of clients Denise...specializing in any area?
Tamra (tamra@hcstudios.com) (4/22/2002
9:11 AM): weber, does that mean you can say different things
on the ebooks/downloads site?
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:12 AM): Anyone
who needs office/secretarial support but can't or doesn't need
full time workers.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:12
AM): But, the FDA doesn't like you to reference certain things
regarding the supplements that you can in a book. Like using
certain ones in recipes, etc.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:12 AM): So Denise, you're a Virtual Assistant?
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:12 AM): I have
all different kinds of clients, business professionals to authors,
to coaches.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:12
AM): Tamra, from my understanding ....yes
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:13 AM): Yes.
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 9:13 AM): [weber - can you put an intro to your digital
site on all of your outgoing eh emails/invoices/notices, maybe
with a free eBook offer?]
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:13 AM): Well, the first suggestion I have for you Denise, is
to post an INTRO or a HELP note on FrankelBiz. I know we have
VA's on there who are doing well.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:14
AM): Jonathan - I can do that, I was also looking into finding
discussion groups so the author of the first eBook can participate
and answer questions etc.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:14 AM): How do
I go about that?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:14 AM): Jumping on to discussion lists is probably the best
cost/result tactics you can find. If you actively participate
in the discussion, you'll find a lot of takers.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:15 AM): Denise, sing up for FrankelBiz by clicking the greenish
button you see at the top frame of this window.....
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:16 AM): the thing to remember about discussion lists is that
90% of the members DON'T post, they just lurk. Which means you
can get in front of them.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:16 AM): Entered
the room.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:16 AM): Entered the room.
bstuckel (4/22/2002 9:16 AM): Entered
the room.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:16 AM): I tried
to post a message, but had a hard time doing it.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:17 AM): Weber, not knowing the content of your ebooks, I still
maintain that offering more content -- even for revenue -- broadens
and deepens your URL as a resource. I don'
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:17 AM): lurking
here
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:17 AM): I don't recommend a new URL, unless you're starting
a whole new business.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:17 AM): Rob: Would you say that stat (90% lurkers) matches
FrankelBiz's demographic?
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:18
AM): We are starting out with a series "Traditional Medical
Food Recipes of China for Prevention and Cure"
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:18 AM): Denise, there are also a lot of lists devoted to sole
practitioners, for example, PR consultants, Marketing people,
etc.
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:18 AM): Entered the room.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:18 AM): How do
I find those people, here?
Tamra (tamra@hcstudios.com) (4/22/2002
9:18 AM): Rob, a fellow web designer did a supplement site which
got shut down by the FDA -- so I think weber's right in separating
out the stuff that may be iffy. The FDA may not even see his
two sites as *enough* separation!
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:18 AM): Hi peter....that's a tough question....we definitely
have regulars, but no, I'd guess that most people lurk, but those
who do post are varied.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:19
AM): The first eBook in the series is "Beauty, Anti-Aging,
Prolong Life Foods and Recipes"
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 9:19 AM): Rob - how many folks subscribe to FrankelBiz,
if I may ask?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:19 AM): Peter, we get maybe ten posts through a day, but they're
rarely from the same ten people. In fact, I boot a lot of posts
from the over-eager types.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:19 AM): Rob -
can you email info. on posting?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:20 AM): Jonathan, we have a few thousand, but the response
rates make people think we have 100,000! that's mainly because
some posts get re-posted on other lists.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:20
AM): Peter - FrankelBiz is a great resource
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:21 AM): Denise, once you've subbed, just e-mail to FrankelBiz@listerv.robfrankel.com
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 9:21 AM): Rob - thanks, that helps me evaluate my
response rate :)
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:21 AM): what
constitutes an over eager type?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:21 AM): In fact, this week's advertiser was blown away....they
had been used to buying 200,000 e-mail addresses at a time.
denise742 (4/22/2002 9:21 AM): Well
I am submitted, I receive postings from other people, but do
not understand how I can post.
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:21 AM): Rob: If a partner and I have conceived of
a "brandable" name for a new business, should we try
to obtain a trademark as quickly as possible?
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:21 AM): icode?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:22 AM): Ed, the over eager types send in posts every few days,
trying to rewrite the same post and thinking that they can post
an ad instead of a business opportunity, I allow one INTRO post
only.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:22 AM): Yes, peter, Icode seems to be pleased.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:22 AM): Bstuckel, I wouldnt
Skip Pratt (skippratt@cox.net) (4/22/2002
9:23 AM): Entered the room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:23 AM): Save your money for now and see if its ultimately
worth protecting. For the moment, you can use an "SM"
which in the USA, serves as a sign to the public that you consider
it protected and are using it as such.
Del (4/22/2002 9:24 AM): Entered the
room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:24 AM): You'd be wiser to spend the money doing a quick search
to see if your brandable name is already in use by someone else.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:24 AM): sm?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:24 AM): Service Mark
Del (4/22/2002 9:25 AM): The only problem
with the technique Rob suggested is that a company or corporation
could be registered in a certain state and possess a state-level
tradename and be doing interstate and intrastate business.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:25 AM): Look at the tag in the top frame under the "Rob
Frankel" logo. Big Time Branding has an SM
Del (4/22/2002 9:25 AM): You can check
federal tradenames at www.uspto.gov or use marksonline.com
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:25 AM): Jonathan, getting back to the response issue, we've
tested against all the big lists out there, and FB consistently
outpulls them.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:26 AM): got it
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:26 AM): Ah ha! Thank you, we'll be able to focus
on other things right now.
j.d.schlesinger (4/22/2002 9:26 AM):
Entered the room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:26 AM): That's true, Del. Life is a risk. But as I recall,
you can go to Thomson and Thomson and do a state search, too.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:26 AM): Rob, it also helped that you PLUGGED icode yourself
:-)
Frederick (the1960area.com) (4/22/2002
9:26 AM): Entered the room.
Del (4/22/2002 9:27 AM): I wanna say
that's a ~$600 fee though.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:27 AM): Bstuckel, don't spend time on protecting your brand
name; use the resources to build a strong brand!
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:27 AM): Yosef, that's what sponsors pay $1K a week for. Otherwise,
they'd just buy Frankelinks for $25.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:28 AM): Ahhhhh!!!! :-)
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:28 AM): Got it! ;-)
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:28 AM): Yosef, that's the whole point of a Branded Community.
FB's know that I try to find suitable reputable sponsors. Sponsors
know that approval is worth more response. Everyone wins.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:29 AM): In fact, I don't have their figures yet because the
campaign is not over, but so far, every sponsor on FB has made
money.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:29 AM): Agreed. Your sponsors have ALWAYS been worthwhile to
the group.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:30 AM): Right...and we don't approve that many, although I
get many offers. Lots of slimebags out there.
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:30 AM): Rob: You've said, "Doing it yourself
works--for suicide"...how soon after we have created the
idea for this brand would you recommend talking to a branding
specialist? As soon as we can afford it?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:30 AM): Anyone else have an issue? I don't want to hog the
time
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:31 AM): Remember my pricing question in FrankelTips a few weeks
ago?...
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:31 AM): Yes, Bstuckel, ASAP. "The brand belongs in the
business plan." Once you get that down, everything else
flows much more smoothly -- and believe me, I've done enough
startups to see the difference.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:31 AM): The publisher STILL won't allow me to raise the price
where it SHOULD be. Any suggestions?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:31 AM): Repeat it Yosef for everyone else here.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:32 AM): Yosef, how are sales there?
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:33 AM): Thanks, I promise that you'll be the first
person we contact...actually, your branding is strong enough
that you are the only choice!
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:33 AM): Entered the room.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:33 AM): Aha! It works! (Tee Hee!)
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:33 AM): All of
this seems to center around b2b. What about a non tech product
to end users, such as golf clubs?! is the point here to build
brand through other like communities such as golf bulletin boards
and such?
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:33 AM): Sales are OK, but so many people look/sound disappointed
when I tell them that the price is only $60. They were expecting
something "more valuable". I'll cut and paste the original
question in a moment.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:34 AM): no problem. What really counts is that you realize
you've got a client who really doesn't want help making money.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:35 AM): Yes, Ed. Branding works equally well in the B2C space.
In fact, that's the situation in which Yosef finds himself now.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:35 AM): (Sliding into the room - a better late than never :))
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:35 AM): Pricing often causes people a lot of problems.. and
not just the buyers!
Del (4/22/2002 9:36 AM): Rob: Any word
on a new book? (Son of Brand-X, heh.)
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:36 AM): Yosef's issue was that his competition was no better
-- his product is actually better -- but the company thinks a
cheaper price will drive sales.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:36 AM): Brand-X Episode 2: Attack of the Brands
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:36 AM): Del, actually working on it, believe it or not. Very
busy these days, though.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:37 AM): With our company, I've realized that it is suicidal
to try and differentiate ourselves from competitors on the basis
of pricing. Sure, people do buy based on price, but that is not
the only factor.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:37 AM): There will be at least one new chapter and quite a
bit of revision. Hoping to get better proofreaders this time!
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:37 AM): what
perplexes me (and research/time will only tell) is can brand,
i.e. sales be built via the web on a non conventional product
such as a revolutionary new putter? and can I reach my market
from here?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:37 AM): Branding uber alles, Sharon. Always will be.
Del (4/22/2002 9:38 AM): Ed: Videostreams
showing product in use?
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:38 AM): Ed - YES
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:38 AM): YES! Ed, absolutely it can be done. But it's not going
to happen for free or overnight. people have a misconception
that because the web is "free", it's totally without
cost. not true.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:39 AM): Rob: Not too busy to accept new business I hope, I'm
pointing a company I work for in your direction soon.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:39 AM): It's funny how many golfers there are online.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:39 AM): Peter, remind me to send you a really nice gift, that's
great!
bstuckel (bstuckel@mail.colgate.edu)
(4/22/2002 9:40 AM): Thanks everybody, time for class!
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:40 AM): lol It hasn't happened yet. I'll drop you a line sometime
though, they're a startup that really need the help with their
branding!
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:41 AM): now the
trick?! is to reach them, cost effectively, and get sales.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:41 AM): Ed: Definitely. We're all trying to do that :)
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:42 AM): Here's the (rather lengthy) original pricing question
(apologies for the lack of proper formatting here in the chat
program): "Where would YOU price the program, given the
following: 1) The author normally charges (and gets) $250 per
person for a 2-day workshop (20 to 40 people).. 2) The main competition
(a program called the "see clearly method"), promoted
by Mariette Hartley on radio stations throughout the country
charges $209.85 (or "3 easy payments of $69.95")..
3) Our program works MUCH faster. "See Clearly" says
"8 weeks". We can have most people out of glasses or
contacts in only 3 weeks. And it only takes that LONG for Presbyopia
(needing reading glasses over age 40). Astigmatism takes about
2 weeks and straight myopia (near-sighted) takes, at most, a
week and a half (usually only a couple of days). We had a customer
last month who was done in only 5 minutes (20/30 to 20/20). When
I did the program myself last year, I paid $39.95. When I started
marketing it, I wanted to price it at $89.95 but the publisher,
who was selling only handful in a GOOD month, flatly refused
saying that it was "too high", so we compromised at
$59.95 (actually, I fought tooth and nail with him just to get
it to THAT level). I think the low price has put us in the "snake
oil" category (our sales level confirms this). After reading
your article, I'm more convinced that even $89.95 was WAY too
low and that we should price it at or above the competition.
Your take?"
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:42 AM): I'm telling you, that if you have a clear brand, really
give them something to evangelize, and then follow through with
it, you can't miss.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:43 AM): it seems
that many of you sell e-commerce type products...anybody sell
actual products?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:43 AM): The problem is that most companies -- even me -- can't
do their own branding. big mistake to try.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:43 AM): Ed, I sell tapes. Does that count?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:43 AM): And books.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:44
AM): Ed - we do on emperorsherbologist.com
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:45 AM): Ed, "real" products do just fine on the web.
but most web-people are under-funded. The rule to remember is
that "the less money you have, the longer it takes."
And a good branding strategy, implemented with solid tactics
can deliver for you.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:46 AM): Denise - please send your contact info to yosef@suddenvision.com.
Besides the vision thing, I'm also an account/tax preparer. We
MAY have some overlap :-)
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:46 AM): Sort
of Rob, but I mean they are still info based. and I 'm not being
S.A. here I just want to know if the non info can do it on the
web
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:46 AM): Yosef - it comes down to ROI - at what pricing level,
will your ROI be highest?
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:47 AM): and you
info folks...I would love to have your margins.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:47 AM): The answer is yes, Ed. There are people selling everything
from underwear to tons of scrap metal on the web. It's just a
matter of marketing it properly and gauging your expectations
accordingly.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:48 AM): I'm already giving myself an eye-test with the stuff
on Yosef's site :-)
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:48 AM): Ed, if you don't have the right margins, you may be
structuring your pricing incorrectly.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:48 AM): Sharon, I agree with you, but the publisher REFUSES
to raise the darn price. The rationale is THIS: Since the seminar
is 2 days and costs $250, and the tape is only 2 hours out of
those 2 days and isn't "as effective" as the seminar
(with one-on-one help), the tape shouldn't cost nearly as much
as the seminar.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:48 AM): Peter, you're in good form today!
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:49 AM): Yosef, you clearly have client problem, not a product
issue. There are some clients that simply don't know how to use
the vendors they hire.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:49 AM): Thanks, Peter! :-)
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:49 AM): No I
have good/great margins just not as great as you guys.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:49 AM): The eye test disagrees! I'm 20/125 without my glasses
on :-(
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:49 AM): Ed - the majority of our clients (we provide email
marketing services) sell tangible products. I think that email
marketing can be the most cost effective component of product
marketing.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:50 AM): Ed, without knowing your margins, I really couldn't
say. But getting back to your question, yes, the web can be great
for golf. Lord knows there are enough golf sites out there1
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:50 AM): Yosef - are they using the seminar as an upset from
the tape? If so, they may have a point. If not, they need to
be treated as two separate products with 2 audiences.
Del (4/22/2002 9:50 AM): Sharon: email
lists are great. Our list subscribers almost always give us a
5% buy-through rate during our monthly mailing.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:50 AM): well
I have gone this far and just have to spend the time and money
to do it right.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): Del - love to hear success stories :)
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): Y'know, this chat isn't just great for advice, but
I find it actually gets me fired up to go do the work ;-)
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): I agree about e-mail. It is definitely the killer app.
But like fire, it can be used for good or evil. It's all in how
you use it.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): Sorry, Yosef I meant an UPSELL from the tape.
Peter Cooper (peter@boog.co.uk) (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): With the economy in the shape the media keeps bleating
on about, it gets disheartening sometimes.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:51 AM): (TEN MINUTE WARNING)
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:52 AM): They're not a client. They're my supplier. They gave
me free reign to do just about anything, and they SAY they want
to make money, but they just won't BUDGE.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:52 AM): Peter, we aim to please...anyone else have an issue
to toss out? I don't want anyone to get left out.
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 9:52 AM): Yosef - are there any low-cost add-ons you
can throw in, that could give you a reason to convince them to
raise prices?
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:52 AM): Sharon - THEY say that they DO use it as an upsell,
but I havent actually seen them do it. The author lives
in Hong Kong and comes to the US on tour once or twice a year.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:53 AM): Peter, to quote a famous president, "I feel your
pain." Business is down for everyone. My friends in NYC
in advertising are all out of work -- no income since early last
year.
Del (4/22/2002 9:53 AM): Sharon: we're
thinking of trying an html test to our mailing list (our products
are specifically image-oriented). Has your company seen sales
differences between html/text mailings (you or your clients)?
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:53 AM): what
do think about site evaluators( critique your site and tell you
whats wrong) especially for a newbie?
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:53 AM): Jonathan - Yes, I suppose I could change the "free
coaching if necessary" to an add-on called "price includes
4 hours of coaching" :-)
Skip Pratt (skippratt@cox.net) (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): Yosef, perhaps you could write a companion eBook, bundle
it with the primary product and sell for double price...
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): Jonathan, that's not going to help Yosef. This is a
client-management issue, not a product or marketing issue. Yosef's
vision client suffers from deafness!
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): He won't listen!
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): Del - I can give you some solid numbers on html vs.
text based on our handling or involvement in over 500 million
emails delivered per month for clients.
Skip Pratt (skippratt@cox.net) (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): good point Rob...
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:54 AM): TUNNEL vision, actually :-)
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:55 AM): What we have found is that you will ALWAYS get a better
response rate if you give people the format they have requested
as opposed to forcing them to HTML.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:55 AM): Ed, site-evaluators will give you an opinion, just
like anyone else. The problem with them is their criteria for
evaluation: is it usability? Design? Functionality? Sales?
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:55
AM): Sharon, I wrote to you about a month ago and haven't received
a reply
Skip Pratt (skippratt@cox.net) (4/22/2002
9:55 AM): Sharon, could you send me your email...I'd like to
chat with you later....
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:56 AM): Rob,
do you do that? I mean some opinions are better than others
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:56 AM): <---Hates HTML mail with a passion, as do the 80%+
people in the USA who are on dial up!
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:56 AM): For most types of products/services, HTML does little
to increase CTR - however, if visuals will assist in the sale,
then you might want to consider it as an OPTION
Del (4/22/2002 9:56 AM): I had once
worked in an office complex where the next door business was
a stereo speaker manufacturer. He asks me to come over and listen
to some music. Tiny speakers and huge speakers (5' tall) line
the walls and the "viewing" area. I sit, listen and
am astonished at the clarity of the music. He points to some
12" x 9" bookshelf speakers and says that's where their
coming from.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:56 AM): Skip - since the video comes with a pamphlet, an eBook
would be redundant. You idea IS on the right track, though.
Del (4/22/2002 9:56 AM): $600/pair.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:56 AM): Rob - its around 50/50 now, not 80% on dialup
Del (4/22/2002 9:56 AM): If I had just
seen those without first listening to them 10 minutes, I would
have said $100-150/pair.
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 9:56 AM): sales..obviously
and service
Skip Pratt (skippratt@cox.net) (4/22/2002
9:56 AM): just thinking of a way to make it YOUR offer...
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): weber - I apologize. what address did u send it to?
I receive over 2-3,000 emails a day :)
Del (4/22/2002 9:57 AM): Point is, buyers
need to be informed before they can realize the "value"
of a product.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): 50% of the country is on broadband? You're kidding.
Where did you hear that?
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): Skip - since this chat is archived, email us at support@listhost.net
and ask for my direct email.
Frederick (the1960area.com) (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): Yosef, I have just been to your site - I am interested
as a customer - but I cannot find where I can buy the product
- Yoo much flash, too much info - Fine , but Where's the beef?
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): (TWO MINUTES)
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:57 AM): Rob - it hit the 50 mark in December according to two
reports.
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:58
AM): I'll have to look it up. Actually, I got a canned response
that you were moving or something and would be following up very
shortly
Del (4/22/2002 9:58 AM): 80% is your
number, rob. I've seen major reports citing a 35-46% html subscriber
base.
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:58 AM): Skip - you're absolutely right. I have to make it "my
own". Something that distinguishes it from the publisher's
direct sales site. The coaching just might do it.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:58 AM): ß - Also can't stand those self-indulgent Flash
intros!!! Grrrrrr!
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:58 AM): sorry weber, doesnt ring a bell. :)
Del (4/22/2002 9:58 AM): But the mailing
program I'm planning to use is MIME compliant (sends both a text
and html mailing and lets the mailing software at the receivers
end decide how to view it.)
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:59 AM): Ok.... I can share some quick numbers on html/txt as
far as CHOICES go... For b2b, we run about 40% opting for HTML
while the numbers are reversed for B2C
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
9:59 AM): Flash sucks if you have to watch it EVERY time you
access the same site.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:59 AM): Wow, Sharon, that's fast!
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
9:59 AM): Del - no no, do NOT use that
weber jajagroup.com (4/22/2002 9:59
AM): Oh well. I ma interested in seeing if your service can do
something, and If so what is the cost
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
9:59 AM): I SO agree, Yosef.
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
10:00 AM): Sorry if I seem emphatic, but distinguishing between
HTML and plain text recipients on the fly does not work for 70%
of recipients.
RobFrankel (rob@robfrankel.com) (4/22/2002
10:00 AM): Okay, well that's one heck of an hour we had there.
I sure enjoy these! Hope it helped. Ill see you all online!
Yosef (SuddenVision.com) (4/22/2002
10:00 AM): Denise, are you still here?
Ed Holand (4/22/2002 10:00 AM): Thanks
rob
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 10:00 AM): Too bad - I'd like to see some innovative
use of Flash splash screens - maybe you could play a game in
them :)
Jonathan (jacohen@damnfinewriting.com)
(4/22/2002 10:00 AM): bye Rob
Sharon Tucci - slingshotmedia.com (4/22/2002
10:00 AM): Sorry, I meant it works for 70%. :)
|